Tiny drops of rain fall over the five Century of Progress homes in Beverly Shores, Ind. It’s a gray, gloomy day and though it’s only rain, the fog and water create the feeling of being stuck in a shaken snow globe. The
House of Tomorrow sits high atop a hill overlooking Lake Michigan.
It looks far from the way it did in 1935, the year the homes were transported to Beverly Shores from the
1933 Chicago World’s Fair. It looks sad.
Its exterior is covered in torn white Tyrek paper, over grown weeds shoot out from its foundation and there is no sign of human presence.
The other four homes look much different.
It is the lonesome House of Tomorrow, the most visually strange, that remains the only home vacant and virtually untouched for over a decade.
Finding a new home
The 1933 Chicago World’s Fair was during a time of great loss. To help repair national pride, the fair included an exhibit of model homes displaying the era’s architectural achievements entitled, “A Century of Progress.” In 1934, when the fair ended, five of the homes were saved from demolition and moved to Beverly Shores to draw attention to the growing beach town.
“The fact that the homes came from the Century of Progress fair was integral to the formation of the Beverly Shores community,” said Leo Firme, owner of
Save the Dunes Gift Shop and long time resident of Beverly Shores.
Although each of the homes has its own unique beauty, the House of Tomorrow’s design has made it one of the more intriguing since the homes settled on the shore 77 years ago.
“In that time, people we very inventive, and this [the House of Tomorrow] is one of the interesting details,” Firme said. “There’s not many of those places left.”
Inspiration and design for the House of Tomorrow
Chicago architect
George Fred Keck designed the home in the early 30’s as an everyday house for people of the near future.
Though the home appears incredibly forward thinking, complete with an airplane hanger next to the garage, Keck got his idea from the 1800s.
“It was a forward design, yes, and backward,” said Judy Collins, architectural historian for the
Indiana Dunes National Lakeshore.
“The design is based on a historic house in Wisconsin.
It’s an octagon shaped house and all the utilities in that house went up through the center.
It dates back to the 1860s and functioned extremely well.”
When the House of Tomorrow was being built, it was thought that it would be freezing due to the high number of windows. However, there was tremendous and unexpected heat gain because of the windows.
“Keck essentially rediscovered solar design,” Collins said.
Unfortunately, the windows were inoperable, and during the summer months the house became so hot that the air conditioner of the time constantly broke down.
“His design was both a success and a bit of a failure at the same time,” Collins said. “Rediscovering solar heat, but not having a way to get the extra heat out in the summer.”
Once the house was established in Beverly Shores, operable windows were put in to help with the temperature balance of the space. It was still not enough to make the design sought after.
“Speaking as a designer, I think people relate to what they feel comfortable in and familiar with,” Collins explained. “People just couldn’t yet see themselves living in modern architecture.”
The process of restoring what time has damaged
The House of Tomorrow was sold to its first private owner in 1938.
Soon after in 1940, it was sold again.
This pattern continued until 1970, when the Indiana Dunes National Lakeshore, a division of the
National Parks Service (NPS) purchased it, along with the four other homes.
Currently, the NPS still owns the property as well as the homes themselves, but they lease them to the
Indiana Landmarks organization as part of the Historic Landmarks Leasing Program.
Indiana Landmarks in turn subleases the homes in increments of 30 years to individuals who are financially capable of restoring the homes to their original grandeur.
The last party who subleased the House of Tomorrow had their lease revoked and did little to start the restoration process on the home.
“The basic rule or approach is that there needs to progress being made and the individuals subleasing the homes need to follow the plan created by the National Parks Service,” said Todd Zeiger, director of the Indiana Landmark’s Northern Regional Office. “Unfortunately, we had to terminate the party’s sublease due to the lack of work underway and the lack of progress that was being made. The party vacated in late 2006.”
No substantial work was completed and the home has not been subleased to another party since.
“The Structure is fine,” Zeiger said. “Indiana Landmarks put a new roof on three years ago so it’s water tight.”
However, Collins still believes the House of Tomorrow is more of a ticking bomb and the sooner it can be subleased, the better.
“I’ve been holding my breath because we’ve gone through so many years of no work being done and it’s deteriorating so quickly,” she said.
“The building will likely be a challenging restoration both technically and financially,” said Paul Hayden, community preservation specialist for the Indiana Landmark’s Northern Regional Office. “The hope would be to put this property into the hands of an individual who appreciates its unique character.”
The community is also waiting for the day the House of Tomorrow will begin its transformation back to its initial, ultramodern condition, bringing the historic lakefront district full circle.
“It’d be nice to see the House of Tomorrow back to its original state,” Firme said.
Arisen Issues
Though everyone involved with the Century of Progress homes wants The House of Tomorrow to be subleased and rehabbed, getting to that point has been difficult.
“The challenge with the House of Tomorrow has been an ongoing association with the NPS over the terms that we can offer in a sublease,” Zeiger said. “We’ve not been able to reach an agreement with them that will provide enough incentive as far as time in a sublease.”
The height of the disagreement stems from changes in the program’s regulations that were established in 2000. Both Zeiger and Collins are vague in their explanations on the exact issue the new regulations have uncovered.
“It’s a very sensitive situation,” Collins said. “The NPS was fully in agreement with the program when it was first put in place, but there have been some questions about the legalities of the agreement that we have between the NPS and Indiana Landmarks after the new regulations were put in place.”
One large issue the NPS has is that the “lease” they have with Indiana Landmarks is in reality more of a contract than a valid lease.
“We’re looking to change it from an agreement to an actual lease,” Collins said. “We’ve been going through a lot of consultations to make sure we get the correct language in this lease to protect everyone’s interests.”
The disagreement between the two parties has caused a major delay in finding someone to sublease the House of Tomorrow. Fortunately, Collins said there have been many people interested in subleasing the home and luckily, one person in particular has remained involved for years and is still pursuing the project. However, until an agreement is reached between the NPS and Indiana Landmarks, all developments are on the back burner.
“Until we can get this all nailed down with the parks service, we’re not going to be able to find someone to lease the house,” Zeiger said. “There’s nothing wrong with the property that’s scaring people away, it’s really about the terms we can offer in a sublease.”
The Importance of The House of Tomorrow
While the different departments and organizations may not agree on terms for a new lease quite yet, they all do believe the preservation and restoration of the House of Tomorrow is the highest priority.
“It has such an important structural style,” Zeiger said. “It shows innovation, especially for that time, it was so radical. It’s important for the public to see that storyline of architecture.”
The House of Tomorrow has a special magnetism to it. After nearly eight decades of harsh weather, several owners and hardly any work done, the home is still hanging on, waiting for the day it can again share its history.
“To restore a building from the past is a gift to the future,” Hayden said. “It ensures that the best examples of older structures are around for the next generation to enjoy and appreciate.”